Main Page | Chinese News | English News | Reviews | Forum | UK Price List | US Price List | Links | History | Contact | Privacy | Site Map

Custom Search


Go Back   OCWorkbench Lifestyle and Tech Forums > PC Problems, Mainboard and Graphics card troubleshooting > General Mainboards/CPU/Chipsets/OC-MOD > CPU/Chipsets - ATI, Intel, nVIDIA, SiS, ULI, VIA

CPU/Chipsets - ATI, Intel, nVIDIA, SiS, ULI, VIA Post your general chipset discussions here, including the nForce2, SiS, VIA etc.

Click here to resend forum activation email
Lost your password, Request it here


AMD vs Intel new processors

CPU/Chipsets - ATI, Intel, nVIDIA, SiS, ULI, VIA


Reply
Add this thread to:  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 17-10-2004, 09:51 PM
bluetooth bluetooth is offline
The one
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 97,434
Potenza rep: 10
bluetooth has disabled reputation
Post

AMD is about to release the Athlon 64 FX-55 chip next week to counter the new series of Intel processors which we mentioned on this news page some days ago. The chip is expected to be unveiled on Tuesday, along with the AMD Athlon 64 4000+, the top rated CPU from AMD. According to information, the A64 FX-55 offers an overall performance improvement of 8.7 percent over the Athlon 64 4000+.

Intel will release the P4 EE processors starting from 3.46GHz to compete head on soon. The extreme edition improves performance with additional cache.
__________________
Check out our new VIDEO Site at http://www.youtube.com/ocworkbench

Follow us now at :
http://www.twitter.com/ocworkbench
and Join our Facebook Fan page at
http://www.facebook.com/ocworkbenchconnect
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-10-2004, 10:30 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brisbane Down Under
Posts: 6,452
Potenza rep: 0
grumpy is an unknown quantity at this point
8.7 % improvement sounds like cow manure to me, and cow manure will be a lot cheaper..still, it will be faster than anything Intel throws at it :D
__________________
Doing Dumb Things Since The 6502A
Reply With Quote
OCWorkbench
  #3  
Old 18-10-2004, 12:37 AM
RayvenX's Avatar
RayvenX RayvenX is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 5,335
Potenza rep: 0
RayvenX is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

3.46GHz = FSB 1066 maybe? Sounds like an odd number to derive from 200. That's a step forward if Intel are actually announcing it...
__________________
Gigabyte Z68A-D3-B3 | Intel i5 2500K | 8GB PC3-12800C9 | XFX HD 5870 1024MB
Hitachi 7K1000.B 1000GB 16MB | Hitachi T7K500 320GB 16MB | 2x Seagate 7200.10 320GB 8MB RAID 0 | Optiarc DVD±RW AD-7240S
OCZ StealthXstream 600 | Cooler Master CM-690

Motorola Atrix
360 60GB | PS3 20GB

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-10-2004, 01:37 AM
bluetooth bluetooth is offline
The one
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 97,434
Potenza rep: 10
bluetooth has disabled reputation
Post

Yes it is FSB1066. please see mainpage.
__________________
Check out our new VIDEO Site at http://www.youtube.com/ocworkbench

Follow us now at :
http://www.twitter.com/ocworkbench
and Join our Facebook Fan page at
http://www.facebook.com/ocworkbenchconnect
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2004, 12:45 AM
Borsik Borsik is offline
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Russia
Posts: 1
Potenza rep: 0
Borsik is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

As I understand there are no actual advantage of A64-FX55 between him and PIV 3.46 on the highest chipsets from the both sides?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2004, 02:06 AM
AndyB AndyB is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: France
Posts: 1,332
Potenza rep: 0
AndyB is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

The FX-55 is overall a better CPU when compared to the P4 3.46. Not incredibly better, but better - and slightly cheaper.

Regarding the chipsets, the highest performing AGP cards are at about the same level as the highest performing PCI-e cards, so there is little difference in chipsets for the P4 or for the K8. The other features are comparable so there is no advantage for either platform.

The one sore point is that the P4 3.46 platform forces you to go to fast DDR2 for good performance. Comparing the prices of fast DDR2
with low-latency DDR400, you'll notice DDR2 is twice as expensive or more.

If you are configuring a system with 4GB of RAM, that could add up to an extra $1000 or more for the P4 3.46.

So the logical choice is the AMD FX-55.
__________________
K7S8XE+, OCW Beta BIOS 1.91a, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2GHz, 1.75V Vcore, 1 x 512Mo noname PC3200 RAM, Zalman CNPS7000A-AlCu, 300W Enermax PSU.<br />Rock-stable @ 42/47C Sys/CPU temps (summer).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2004, 08:34 AM
pulsar pulsar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 36
Potenza rep: 0
pulsar is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Intel claims having the edge over Amd on dual core chips: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19478
__________________
Mainboard: Gigabyte GA K8NF-9<br />CPU: AMD64 3200+ (ADA3200DAA4BW)<br />HSF: Tt BlueOrb II<br />Memory: 2x512MB MDT (DDR400)<br />GPU: ATI Radeon X1300LE<br />PSU: Fortron BlueStorm 400W
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2004, 05:29 PM
sfw1960's Avatar
sfw1960 sfw1960 is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan ,USA
Posts: 631
Potenza rep: 0
sfw1960 is an unknown quantity at this point
I have read many intel claims....
I think they are full 0' h00ey - AGAIN.
__________________
UbU's $on Of S&v&n:
AsRock 880 GM-LE ,Phenom X4 965 @4G, HD6670 Sapphire ,2X 4GB G-Skill RipJawz F3-12800 DDR3 , RW 630W PSU, HL/DT/ST -GH22LP20 +TSST SH-222AB , Samsung 830/128SSD, HD103SJ x2 (1 for backups)...several externals
W7x64Pro / UbU11.10_AMD64
Live and learn , or DIE tryin' !!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2004, 09:49 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brisbane Down Under
Posts: 6,452
Potenza rep: 0
grumpy is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

As someone said, Intel only will have 1 Dual Core with shared cache ( Intel says this is Superior Technology ), the other Intel Dual Cores use the same cache system as AMD [img]tongue.gif[/img] Intels best CPU with the most promise long term is Pentium M. As long as we get value for money, any CPU will be good [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
Doing Dumb Things Since The 6502A
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US pricing of Intel E6XXX Processors bluetooth IT Offers from US, UK and Europe 0 10-09-2006 10:42 PM
Intel mobile processors Petar Supica ASRock (AMD Boards) 1 11-06-2005 07:29 PM
Mac to use INtel processors bluetooth 處理器/主機板/顯示卡/記憶體 0 24-05-2005 08:46 PM
WTB: Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz to 2.6GHz processors (with FSB 400MHz only) yaoxing Buy & Sell (International) 7 16-08-2004 12:23 AM
How you can read FPO/batch for Intel processors chrono General Mainboards/CPU/Chipsets/OC-MOD 1 13-11-2002 07:04 PM


(C) Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2011
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2013 Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, China, Taiwan, USA, UK