Main Page | Chinese News | English News | Reviews | Forum | UK Price List | US Price List | Links | History | Contact | Privacy | Site Map

Custom Search


Go Back   OCWorkbench Lifestyle and Tech Forums > Specials > Mobile and Gadget News

Mobile and Gadget News Post your findings of latest mobiles, PDAs, ringtones and information here. CommunicAsia coverage

Click here to resend forum activation email
Lost your password, Request it here


South Carolina clamps down on municipal Wi-Fi menace

Mobile and Gadget News


Reply
Add this thread to:  Submit to Clesto Clesto  Submit to Digg Digg  Submit to Reddit Reddit  Submit to Furl Furl  Submit to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Submit to Spurl Spurl
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 30-06-2012, 04:11 PM
bluetooth bluetooth is offline
The one
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 97,292
Potenza rep: 10
bluetooth has disabled reputation
Default South Carolina clamps down on municipal Wi-Fi menace

Ars Technica has a steller report on the South Carolina state legislature’s recent passage of a bill that “effectively makes it difficult, if not impossible” for town and city governments to create their own municipal Wi-Fi networks — networks that are aimed at giving citizens taxpayer-funded, free-to-use Internet service. The two big powers behind the legislation, Ars reports, were AT&T and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a group that creates corporate-friendly model legislation for state legislators to pass. ALEC’s primary objection to municipal Wi-Fi, it seems, is that it might compete with private Wi-Fi services and put the squeeze on incumbent carriers’ profitability.
“If municipalities are inclined to pursue broadband initiatives then certain safeguards must be put in place in order to ensure that private providers, with whom the municipality will compete with, are not disadvantaged by the municipality in the exercise of its bonding and taxing authority, management of rights of way, assessment of fees or taxes, or in any other way,” the organization says in outlining its policy recommendations.
Jim Baller, a Washington, DC-based telecom lawyer, tells Ars that the South Carolina legislation is particularly restrictive of municipal Wi-Fi projects because “it does not grandfather existing projects and would retroactively undermine federal stimulus grants that Orangeburg and Oconee Counties have received.” Predictably, Ars notes that the bill’s author and many of its sponsors received donations from AT&T last year.
Read


More...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


(C) Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2011
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Copyright OCWORKBENCH 1998-2013 Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, China, Taiwan, USA, UK